Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

8C1P

Active state homomeric GluA1 AMPA receptor in complex with TARP gamma 3

Summary for 8C1P
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb8c1p/pdb
EMDB information16379
DescriptorGlutamate receptor 1 flip isoform, Voltage-dependent calcium channel gamma-3 subunit, CYCLOTHIAZIDE, ... (8 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsampar, ion channels, neurotransmission, membrane protein
Biological sourceRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
More
Total number of polymer chains8
Total formula weight559021.93
Authors
Zhang, D.,Ivica, J.,Krieger, J.M.,Ho, H.,Yamashita, K.,Cais, O.,Greger, I. (deposition date: 2022-12-21, release date: 2023-08-30, Last modification date: 2024-10-16)
Primary citationZhang, D.,Ivica, J.,Krieger, J.M.,Ho, H.,Yamashita, K.,Stockwell, I.,Baradaran, R.,Cais, O.,Greger, I.H.
Structural mobility tunes signalling of the GluA1 AMPA glutamate receptor.
Nature, 621:877-882, 2023
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: AMPA glutamate receptors (AMPARs), the primary mediators of excitatory neurotransmission in the brain, are either GluA2 subunit-containing and thus Ca-impermeable, or GluA2-lacking and Ca-permeable. Despite their prominent expression throughout interneurons and glia, their role in long-term potentiation and their involvement in a range of neuropathologies, structural information for GluA2-lacking receptors is currently absent. Here we determine and characterize cryo-electron microscopy structures of the GluA1 homotetramer, fully occupied with TARPγ3 auxiliary subunits (GluA1/γ3). The gating core of both resting and open-state GluA1/γ3 closely resembles GluA2-containing receptors. However, the sequence-diverse N-terminal domains (NTDs) give rise to a highly mobile assembly, enabling domain swapping and subunit re-alignments in the ligand-binding domain tier that are pronounced in desensitized states. These transitions underlie the unique kinetic properties of GluA1. A GluA2 mutant (F231A) increasing NTD dynamics phenocopies this behaviour, and exhibits reduced synaptic responses, reflecting the anchoring function of the AMPAR NTD at the synapse. Together, this work underscores how the subunit-diverse NTDs determine subunit arrangement, gating properties and ultimately synaptic signalling efficiency among AMPAR subtypes.
PubMed: 37704721
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06528-0
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (2.9 Å)
Structure validation

227561

PDB entries from 2024-11-20

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon