Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@TwitterPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

5OTU

Extracellular domain of GLP-1 receptor in complex with GLP-1 variant Ala8Hcs/Thr11Hcs

Summary for 5OTU
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb5otu/pdb
DescriptorGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptor, Glucagon (3 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsglucagon-like peptide 1, gpcr, cyclic peptides, signaling protein
Biological sourceHomo sapiens (Human)
More
Total number of polymer chains4
Total formula weight33939.50
Authors
Mortensen, S. (deposition date: 2017-08-22, release date: 2018-07-04, Last modification date: 2024-10-16)
Primary citationOddo, A.,Mortensen, S.,Thogersen, H.,De Maria, L.,Hennen, S.,McGuire, J.N.,Kofoed, J.,Linderoth, L.,Reedtz-Runge, S.
alpha-Helix or beta-Turn? An Investigation into N-Terminally Constrained Analogues of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) and Exendin-4.
Biochemistry, 57:4148-4154, 2018
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Peptide agonists acting on the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) promote glucose-dependent insulin release and therefore represent important therapeutic agents for type 2 diabetes (T2D). Previous data indicated that an N-terminal type II β-turn motif might be an important feature for agonists acting on the GLP-1R. In contrast, recent publications reporting the structure of the full-length GLP-1R have shown the N-terminus of receptor-bound agonists in an α-helical conformation. To reconcile these conflicting results, we prepared N-terminally constrained analogues of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and exendin-4 and evaluated their receptor affinity and functionality in vitro; we then examined their crystal structures in complex with the extracellular domain of the GLP-1R and used molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulations for further investigations. We report that the peptides' N-termini in all determined crystal structures adopted a type II β-turn conformation, but in vitro potency varied several thousand-fold across the series. Potency correlated better with α-helicity in our computational model, although we have found that the energy barrier between the two mentioned conformations is low in our most potent analogues and the flexibility of the N-terminus is highlighted by the dynamics simulations.
PubMed: 29877701
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00105
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.8 Å)
Structure validation

227111

PDB entries from 2024-11-06

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon