Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

4G1E

Crystal structure of integrin alpha V beta 3 with coil-coiled tag.

Summary for 4G1E
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb4g1e/pdb
DescriptorIntegrin alpha-V, 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-beta-D-glucopyranose, SULFATE ION, ... (14 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsprotein binding, cell surface receptor
Biological sourceHomo sapiens (human)
More
Total number of polymer chains2
Total formula weight202768.93
Authors
Dong, X.,Mi, L.,Zhu, J.,Wang, W.,Luo, B.,Springer, T.A. (deposition date: 2012-07-10, release date: 2012-12-12, Last modification date: 2024-11-27)
Primary citationDong, X.,Mi, L.Z.,Zhu, J.,Wang, W.,Hu, P.,Luo, B.H.,Springer, T.A.
AlphaV Beta3 Integrin Crystal Structures and their Functional Implications
Biochemistry, 51:8814-8828, 2012
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Many questions about the significance of structural features of integrin α(V)β(3) with respect to its mechanism of activation remain. We have determined and re-refined crystal structures of the α(V)β(3) ectodomain linked to C-terminal coiled coils (α(V)β(3)-AB) and four transmembrane (TM) residues in each subunit (α(V)β(3)-1TM), respectively. The α(V) and β(3) subunits with four and eight extracellular domains, respectively, are bent at knees between the integrin headpiece and lower legs, and the headpiece has the closed, low-affinity conformation. The structures differ in the occupancy of three metal-binding sites in the βI domain. Occupancy appears to be related to the pH of crystallization, rather than to the physiologic regulation of ligand binding at the central, metal ion-dependent adhesion site. No electron density was observed for TM residues and much of the α(V) linker. α(V)β(3)-AB and α(V)β(3)-1TM demonstrate flexibility in the linker between their extracellular and TM domains, rather than the previously proposed rigid linkage. A previously postulated interface between the α(V) and β(3) subunits at their knees was also not supported, because it lacks high-quality density, required rebuilding in α(V)β(3)-1TM, and differed markedly between α(V)β(3)-1TM and α(V)β(3)-AB. Together with the variation in domain-domain orientation within their bent ectodomains between α(V)β(3)-AB and α(V)β(3)-1TM, these findings are compatible with the requirement for large structural changes, such as extension at the knees and headpiece opening, in conveying activation signals between the extracellular ligand-binding site and the cytoplasm.
PubMed: 23106217
DOI: 10.1021/bi300734n
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (3 Å)
Structure validation

229183

PDB entries from 2024-12-18

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon