Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

3FZJ

TsaR low resolution crystal structure, tetragonal form

Summary for 3FZJ
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb3fzj/pdb
Related3FXQ 3FXR 3FXU
DescriptorLysR type regulator of tsaMBCD (1 entity in total)
Functional Keywordslysr-type, transcriptional regulator, tsar, lttr, whth, transcription regulator
Biological sourceComamonas testosteroni (Pseudomonas testosteroni)
Total number of polymer chains10
Total formula weight336437.27
Authors
Monferrer, D.,Tralau, T.,Kertesz, M.A.,Dix, I.,Kikhney, A.G.,Svergun, D.I.,Uson, I. (deposition date: 2009-01-26, release date: 2010-01-26, Last modification date: 2025-05-28)
Primary citationMonferrer, D.,Tralau, T.,Kertesz, M.A.,Dix, I.,Sola, M.,Uson, I.
Structural studies on the full-length LysR-type regulator TsaR from Comamonas testosteroni T-2 reveal a novel open conformation of the tetrameric LTTR fold.
Mol.Microbiol., 75:1199-1214, 2010
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) constitute the largest family of regulators in prokaryotes. The full-length structures of the LTTR TsaR from Comamonas testosteroni T-2 and its complex with the natural inducer para-toluensulfonate have been characterized by X-ray diffraction. Both ligand-free and complexed forms reveal a dramatically different quaternary structure from that of CbnR from Ralstonia eutropha, or a putative LysR-type regulator from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the only other determined full-length structures of tetrameric LTTRs. Although all three show a head-to-head tetrameric ring, TsaR displays an open conformation, whereas CbnR and PA01-PR present additional contacts in opposing C-terminal domains that close the ring. Such large differences may be due to a broader structural versatility than previously assumed or either, reflect the intrinsic flexibility of tetrameric LTTRs. On the grounds of the sliding dimer hypothesis of LTTR activation, we propose a structural model in which the closed structures could reflect the conformation of a ligand-free LTTR, whereas inducer binding would bring about local changes to disrupt the interface linking the two compact C-terminal domains. This could lead to a TsaR-like, open structure, where the pairs of recognition helices are closer to each other by more than 10 A.
PubMed: 20059681
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07043.x
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (7.1 Å)
Structure validation

246704

PDB entries from 2025-12-24

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon