Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

1ZVT

Structure of the E. coli ParC C-terminal domain

Summary for 1ZVT
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb1zvt/pdb
Related1ZVU
DescriptorTopoisomerase IV subunit A (2 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsbeta-pinwheel, atpase, supercoiling, decatenation, dna binding, dna topology, isomerase
Biological sourceEscherichia coli
Total number of polymer chains2
Total formula weight55203.30
Authors
Corbett, K.D.,Schoeffler, A.J.,Thomsen, N.D.,Berger, J.M. (deposition date: 2005-06-02, release date: 2005-07-05, Last modification date: 2024-02-14)
Primary citationCorbett, K.D.,Schoeffler, A.J.,Thomsen, N.D.,Berger, J.M.
The Structural Basis for Substrate Specificity in DNA Topoisomerase IV.
J.Mol.Biol., 351:545-561, 2005
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Most bacteria possess two type IIA topoisomerases, DNA gyrase and topo IV, that together help manage chromosome integrity and topology. Gyrase primarily introduces negative supercoils into DNA, an activity mediated by the C-terminal domain of its DNA binding subunit (GyrA). Although closely related to gyrase, topo IV preferentially decatenates DNA and relaxes positive supercoils. Here we report the structure of the full-length Escherichia coli ParC dimer at 3.0 A resolution. The N-terminal DNA binding region of ParC is highly similar to that of GyrA, but the ParC dimer adopts a markedly different conformation. The C-terminal domain (CTD) of ParC is revealed to be a degenerate form of the homologous GyrA CTD, and is anchored to the top of the N-terminal domains in a configuration different from that thought to occur in gyrase. Biochemical assays show that the ParC CTD controls the substrate specificity of topo IV, likely by capturing DNA segments of certain crossover geometries. This work delineates strong mechanistic parallels between topo IV and gyrase, while explaining how structural differences between the two enzyme families have led to distinct activity profiles. These findings in turn explain how the structures and functions of bacterial type IIA topoisomerases have evolved to meet specific needs of different bacterial families for the control of chromosome superstructure.
PubMed: 16023670
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.06.029
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.7 Å)
Structure validation

227561

PDB entries from 2024-11-20

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon