Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@TwitterPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

1TVG

X-ray structure of human PP25 gene product, HSPC034. Northeast Structural Genomics Target HR1958.

Summary for 1TVG
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb1tvg/pdb
DescriptorLOC51668 protein, CALCIUM ION, SAMARIUM (III) ION, ... (4 entities in total)
Functional Keywordscell cycle, structural genomics, psi, protein structure initiative, northeast structural genomics consortium, nesg
Biological sourceHomo sapiens (human)
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight17632.98
Authors
Kuzin, A.P.,Vorobiev, S.M.,Lee, I.,Acton, T.B.,Montelione, G.T.,Tong, L.,Hunt, J.F.,Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) (deposition date: 2004-06-29, release date: 2004-11-09, Last modification date: 2024-02-14)
Primary citationRamelot, T.A.,Raman, S.,Kuzin, A.P.,Xiao, R.,Ma, L.C.,Acton, T.B.,Hunt, J.F.,Montelione, G.T.,Baker, D.,Kennedy, M.A.
Improving NMR protein structure quality by Rosetta refinement: a molecular replacement study.
Proteins, 75:147-167, 2009
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: The structure of human protein HSPC034 has been determined by both solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Refinement of the NMR structure ensemble, using a Rosetta protocol in the absence of NMR restraints, resulted in significant improvements not only in structure quality, but also in molecular replacement (MR) performance with the raw X-ray diffraction data using MOLREP and Phaser. This method has recently been shown to be generally applicable with improved MR performance demonstrated for eight NMR structures refined using Rosetta (Qian et al., Nature 2007;450:259-264). Additionally, NMR structures of HSPC034 calculated by standard methods that include NMR restraints have improvements in the RMSD to the crystal structure and MR performance in the order DYANA, CYANA, XPLOR-NIH, and CNS with explicit water refinement (CNSw). Further Rosetta refinement of the CNSw structures, perhaps due to more thorough conformational sampling and/or a superior force field, was capable of finding alternative low energy protein conformations that were equally consistent with the NMR data according to the Recall, Precision, and F-measure (RPF) scores. On further examination, the additional MR-performance shortfall for NMR refined structures as compared with the X-ray structure were attributed, in part, to crystal-packing effects, real structural differences, and inferior hydrogen bonding in the NMR structures. A good correlation between a decrease in the number of buried unsatisfied hydrogen-bond donors and improved MR performance demonstrates the importance of hydrogen-bond terms in the force field for improving NMR structures. The superior hydrogen-bond network in Rosetta-refined structures demonstrates that correct identification of hydrogen bonds should be a critical goal of NMR structure refinement. Inclusion of nonbivalent hydrogen bonds identified from Rosetta structures as additional restraints in the structure calculation results in NMR structures with improved MR performance.
PubMed: 18816799
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22229
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.6 Å)
Structure validation

227111

PDB entries from 2024-11-06

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon