Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@TwitterPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

1P36

T4 LYOSZYME CORE REPACKING MUTANT I100V/TA

Summary for 1P36
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb1p36/pdb
Related1P2L
DescriptorLYSOZYME, POTASSIUM ION, CHLORIDE ION, ... (5 entities in total)
Functional Keywordshydrolase (o-glycosyl), t4 lysozyme, designed core mutant, automated protein design, protein engineering, protein folding, protein stability, core repacking, back revertant, dead-end elimination theorem, side-chain packing, optimized rotamer combinations, orbit, hydrolase
Biological sourceEnterobacteria phage T4
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight18802.47
Authors
Mooers, B.H.,Datta, D.,Baase, W.A.,Zollars, E.S.,Mayo, S.L.,Matthews, B.W. (deposition date: 2003-04-16, release date: 2003-10-07, Last modification date: 2023-08-16)
Primary citationMooers, B.H.,Datta, D.,Baase, W.A.,Zollars, E.S.,Mayo, S.L.,Matthews, B.W.
Repacking the Core of T4 lysozyme by automated design
J.Mol.Biol., 332:741-756, 2003
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Automated protein redesign, as implemented in the program ORBIT, was used to redesign the core of phage T4 lysozyme. A total of 26 buried or partially buried sites in the C-terminal domain were allowed to vary both their sequence and side-chain conformation while the backbone and non-selected side-chains remained fixed. A variant with seven substitutions ("Core-7") was identified as having the most favorable energy. The redesign experiment was repeated with a penalty for the presence of methionine residues. In this case the redesigned protein ("Core-10") had ten amino acid changes. The two designed proteins, as well as the constituent single mutants, and several single-site revertants were over-expressed in Escherichia coli, purified, and subjected to crystallographic and thermal analyses. The thermodynamic and structural data show that some repacking was achieved although neither redesigned protein was more stable than the wild-type protein. The use of the methionine penalty was shown to be effective. Several of the side-chain rotamers in the predicted structure of Core-10 differ from those observed. Rather than changing to new rotamers predicted by the design process, side-chains tend to maintain conformations similar to those seen in the native molecule. In contrast, parts of the backbone change by up to 2.8A relative to both the designed structure and wild-type. Water molecules that are present within the lysozyme molecule were removed during the design process. In the redesigned protein the resultant cavities were, to some degree, re-occupied by side-chain atoms. In the observed structure, however, water molecules were still bound at or near their original sites. This suggests that it may be preferable to leave such water molecules in place during the design procedure. The results emphasize the specificity of the packing that occurs within the core of a typical protein. While point substitutions within the core are tolerated they almost always result in a loss of stability. Likewise, combinations of substitutions may also be tolerated but usually destabilize the protein. Experience with T4 lysozyme suggests that a general core repacking methodology with retention or enhancement of stability may be difficult to achieve without provision for shifts in the backbone.
PubMed: 12963380
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00856-8
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.45 Å)
Structure validation

227111

PDB entries from 2024-11-06

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon