Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@TwitterPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

1F9I

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF THE PHOTOACTIVE YELLOW PROTEIN MUTANT Y42F

Summary for 1F9I
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb1f9i/pdb
Related1F98 2PHY
DescriptorPHOTOACTIVE YELLOW PROTEIN, 4'-HYDROXYCINNAMIC ACID (3 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsphotoreceptor, light-sensor for negative phototaxis, signaling protein
Biological sourceHalorhodospira halophila
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight14036.73
Authors
Brudler, R.,Meyer, T.E.,Genick, U.K.,Tollin, G.,Getzoff, E.D. (deposition date: 2000-07-10, release date: 2000-07-21, Last modification date: 2021-11-03)
Primary citationBrudler, R.,Meyer, T.E.,Genick, U.K.,Devanathan, S.,Woo, T.T.,Millar, D.P.,Gerwert, K.,Cusanovich, M.A.,Tollin, G.,Getzoff, E.D.
Coupling of hydrogen bonding to chromophore conformation and function in photoactive yellow protein.
Biochemistry, 39:13478-13486, 2000
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: To understand in atomic detail how a chromophore and a protein interact to sense light and send a biological signal, we are characterizing photoactive yellow protein (PYP), a water-soluble, 14 kDa blue-light receptor which undergoes a photocycle upon illumination. The active site residues glutamic acid 46, arginine 52, tyrosine 42, and threonine 50 form a hydrogen bond network with the anionic p-hydroxycinnamoyl cysteine 69 chromophore in the PYP ground state, suggesting an essential role for these residues for the maintenance of the chromophore's negative charge, the photocycle kinetics, the signaling mechanism, and the protein stability. Here, we describe the role of T50 and Y42 by use of site-specific mutants. T50 and Y42 are involved in fine-tuning the chromophore's absorption maximum. The high-resolution X-ray structures show that the hydrogen-bonding interactions between the protein and the chromophore are weakened in the mutants, leading to increased electron density on the chromophore's aromatic ring and consequently to a red shift of its absorption maximum from 446 nm to 457 and 458 nm in the mutants T50V and Y42F, respectively. Both mutants have slightly perturbed photocycle kinetics and, similar to the R52A mutant, are bleached more rapidly and recover more slowly than the wild type. The effect of pH on the kinetics is similar to wild-type PYP, suggesting that T50 and Y42 are not directly involved in any protonation or deprotonation events that control the speed of the light cycle. The unfolding energies, 26.8 and 25.1 kJ/mol for T50V and Y42F, respectively, are decreased when compared to that of the wild type (29.7 kJ/mol). In the mutant Y42F, the reduced protein stability gives rise to a second PYP population with an altered chromophore conformation as shown by UV/visible and FT Raman spectroscopy. The second chromophore conformation gives rise to a shoulder at 391 nm in the UV/visible absorption spectrum and indicates that the hydrogen bond between Y42 and the chromophore is crucial for the stabilization of the native chromophore and protein conformation. The two conformations in the Y42F mutant can be interconverted by chaotropic and kosmotropic agents, respectively, according to the Hofmeister series. The FT Raman spectra and the acid titration curves suggest that the 391 nm form of the chromophore is not fully protonated. The fluorescence quantum yield of the mutant Y42F is 1.8% and is increased by an order of magnitude when compared to the wild type.
PubMed: 11063584
DOI: 10.1021/bi0009946
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.1 Å)
Structure validation

226707

PDB entries from 2024-10-30

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon