Loading
PDBj
✖
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

9ZPK

Cryo-EM structure of the complete Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase II in closed clamp conformation

Summary for 9ZPK
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb9zpk/pdb
EMDB information74528
DescriptorDNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit RPB1, DNA-directed RNA polymerases I, II, and III subunit RPABC5, DNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit RPB11, ... (13 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsrna polymerase ii, conformations, promoter loading, eukaryote, transcription
Biological sourceSaccharomyces cerevisiae (brewer's yeast)
More
Total number of polymer chains12
Total formula weight514681.49
Authors
Fordjour, G.N.R.,Murakami, K.,Armache, J.-P.,Murakami, K.S. (deposition date: 2025-12-16, release date: 2026-08-05, Last modification date: 2026-09-09)
Primary citationFordjour, G.N.R.,Palao 3rd, L.,Murakami, K.,Armache, J.P.,Murakami, K.S.
Clamp conformational flexibility and dynamics in archaeal and eukaryotic RNA polymerases revealed by cryo-EM.
J.Biol.Chem., 302:113389-113389, 2026
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: All cellular RNA polymerases (RNAPs) across Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya share a conserved catalytic core, yet bacterial and archaeal-eukaryotic RNAPs diverged after separation from the last universal common ancestor. This evolutionary split produced distinct subunit compositions and fundamentally different requirements for external factors during transcription initiation. Bacterial RNAP relies on a σ factor, whereas archaeal-eukaryotic RNAPs require a more extensive set of general transcription factors (GTFs) to bind promoter DNA, unwind the duplex, and position the template strand within the active site cleft. Notably, despite the close structural similarity between archaeal and eukaryotic RNAPs, the requirement for GTFs became further specialized after the emergence of Eukarya. This divergence raises the question of whether differences in intrinsic conformational flexibility and dynamics of these RNAPs contribute to distinct promoter-loading pathways. In this study, we addressed this question using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to examine archaeal RNAPs from Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota alongside yeast RNAP II. Archaeal RNAP displays a highly dynamic DNA binding clamp domain that samples a broad spectrum of open and closed states, whereas RNAP II predominantly adopts a closed clamp state. Both archaeal and eukaryotic RNAPs can be found in stalk-bound and stalk-less forms. Comparative structural analyses further reveal a unique conformational transition in crenarchaeal RNAP associated with clamp opening. Together, these findings define the intrinsic clamp-conformational landscapes across the archaeal-eukaryotic lineage and suggest that evolutionary tuning of clamp flexibility and dynamics contributes to distinct GTF-dependent promoter-loading mechanisms.
PubMed: 42551829
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2026.113389
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (3.31 Å)
Structure validation

260626

PDB entries from 2026-10-07

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon