Loading
PDBj
✖
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

9TW1

structure of Fab 4012 alone

Summary for 9TW1
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb9tw1/pdb
DescriptorLight Chain of Fab 4012, Heavy Chain of Fab 4012 (3 entities in total)
Functional Keywordscomplex, receptor, fab, protein binding
Biological sourceMus musculus
More
Total number of polymer chains2
Total formula weight47474.56
Authors
Mathieu, M.,Pouzieux, S. (deposition date: 2026-01-13, release date: 2026-10-07)
Primary citationBarozet, A.,Mathieu, M.,Papin, D.,Cameron, B.,Dabdoubi, T.,Severac, A.,Ferrari, P.,Simeon, T.,Bianciotto, M.,Cortes, J.
Antibody CDR-H3 loop flexibility: Insights from X-ray crystallography, structural bioinformatics, and the limits of current deep learning methods.
J.Struct.Biol., 218:108368-108368, 2026
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Complementarity Determining Regions (CDRs) in antibodies, and in particular the CDR-H3 loop, often display conformational plasticity that is essential for their function. Due to this flexibility, the structural investigation of antibody-antigen binding cannot exclusively rely on experimental techniques that only provide snapshots of unbound and bound states, such as X-ray crystallography. Moreover, X-ray structures can be biased due to experimental conditions and crystal packing. In this context, computational techniques, and especially conformational sampling methods, are an essential complement to experiments. This work illustrates the interest of such a coupling of methods on the structural investigation of an anti-FGFR4 (Fibroblast growth factor receptor 4) antibody. X-ray crystallography experiments revealed a very significant conformational change of the CDR-H3 loop between unbound and bound states. Structural bioinformatics methods were then applied to provide a more global picture of the conformational space of this loop, and to confirm that the observed conformations were not the result of experimental artifacts. The experimental unbound conformation was reliably predicted, and the loop conformation observed in the bound state was also predicted to be a probable conformation in the absence of the antigen. The possible existence of a third low-energy conformation, for which there is currently no experimental evidence, was substantiated by molecular simulations. We also applied recent methods based on deep learning techniques to evaluate their ability to predict conformations of the H3 loop. The results show that while these methods are very effective at predicting the structure of rigid/stable regions of proteins, they still have difficulties in accurately representing regions with more variable structure, such as this loop. Overall, this work shows that the structural study of flexible proteins remains an open field of research, and that the synergistic coupling of experimental and computational methods is essential in this context.
PubMed: 42731718
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2026.108368
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.7 Å)
Structure validation

261139

PDB entries from 2026-10-21

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon