Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

7AC1

Solution structure of the TAF4-RST domain

Summary for 7AC1
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb7ac1/pdb
NMR InformationBMRB: 34557
DescriptorTranscription initiation factor TFIID subunit 4 (1 entity in total)
Functional Keywordsalpha-alpha hairpin, alpha-alpha hub, general transcription, transcription factor binding, tfiid, transcription
Biological sourceArabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress)
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight8796.45
Authors
Staby, L.,Davidsen, R.,Bugge, K.,Skriver, K.,Kragelund, B.B. (deposition date: 2020-09-09, release date: 2021-10-06, Last modification date: 2024-06-19)
Primary citationFriis Theisen, F.,Salladini, E.,Davidsen, R.,Jo Rasmussen, C.,Staby, L.,Kragelund, B.B.,Skriver, K.
alpha alpha-hub coregulator structure and flexibility determine transcription factor binding and selection in regulatory interactomes.
J.Biol.Chem., 298:101963-101963, 2022
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Formation of transcription factor (TF)-coregulator complexes is a key step in transcriptional regulation, with coregulators having essential functions as hub nodes in molecular networks. How specificity and selectivity are maintained in these nodes remain open questions. In this work, we addressed specificity in transcriptional networks using complexes formed between TFs and αα-hubs, which are defined by a common αα-hairpin secondary structure motif, as a model. Using NMR spectroscopy and binding thermodynamics, we analyzed the structure, dynamics, stability, and ligand-binding properties of the Arabidopsis thaliana RST domains from TAF4 and known binding partner RCD1, and the TAFH domain from human TAF4, allowing comparison across species, functions, and architectural contexts. While these αα-hubs shared the αα-hairpin motif, they differed in length and orientation of accessory helices as well as in their thermodynamic profiles of ligand binding. Whereas biologically relevant RCD1-ligand pairs displayed high affinity driven by enthalpy, TAF4-ligand interactions were entropy driven and exhibited less binding-induced structuring. We in addition identified a thermal unfolding state with a structured core for all three domains, although the temperature sensitivity differed. Thermal stability studies suggested that initial unfolding of the RCD1-RST domain localized around helix 1, lending this region structural malleability, while effects in TAF4-RST were more stochastic, suggesting variability in structural adaptability upon binding. Collectively, our results support a model in which hub structure, flexibility, and binding thermodynamics contribute to αα-hub-TF binding specificity, a finding of general relevance to the understanding of coregulator-ligand interactions and interactome sizes.
PubMed: 35452682
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101963
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
SOLUTION NMR
Structure validation

259693

PDB entries from 2026-09-16

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon