Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

6SO3

The interacting head motif in insect flight muscle myosin thick filaments

Summary for 6SO3
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb6so3/pdb
EMDB information7029
DescriptorMyosin 2 heavy chain striated muscle, Myosin 2 essential light chain striated muscle, Myosin 2 regulatory light chain striated muscle (3 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsmyosin, thick filament, insect flight muscle, motor protein
Biological sourceLethocerus indicus
More
Total number of polymer chains6
Total formula weight527929.33
Authors
Morris, E.P.,Knupp, C.,Squire, J.M. (deposition date: 2019-08-28, release date: 2020-07-08, Last modification date: 2024-05-15)
Primary citationKnupp, C.,Morris, E.,Squire, J.M.
The Interacting Head Motif Structure Does Not Explain the X-Ray Diffraction Patterns in Relaxed Vertebrate (Bony Fish) Skeletal Muscle and Insect (Lethocerus) Flight Muscle.
Biology (Basel), 8:-, 2019
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Unlike electron microscopy, which can achieve very high resolution but to date can only be used to study static structures, time-resolved X-ray diffraction from contracting muscles can, in principle, be used to follow the molecular movements involved in force generation on a millisecond timescale, albeit at moderate resolution. However, previous X-ray diffraction studies of resting muscles have come up with structures for the head arrangements in resting myosin filaments that are different from the apparently ubiquitous interacting head motif (IHM) structures found by single particle analysis of electron micrographs of isolated myosin filaments from a variety of muscle types. This head organization is supposed to represent the super-relaxed state of the myosin filaments where adenosine triphosphate (ATP) usage is minimized. Here we have tested whether the interacting head motif structures will satisfactorily explain the observed low-angle X-ray diffraction patterns from resting vertebrate (bony fish) and invertebrate (insect flight) muscles. We find that the interacting head motif does not, in fact, explain what is observed. Previous X-ray models fit the observations much better. We conclude that the X-ray diffraction evidence has been well interpreted in the past and that there is more than one ordered myosin head state in resting muscle. There is, therefore, no reason to question some of the previous X-ray diffraction results on myosin filaments; time-resolved X-ray diffraction should be a reliable way to follow crossbridge action in active muscle and may be one of the few ways to visualise the molecular changes in myosin heads on a millisecond timescale as force is actually produced.
PubMed: 31540109
DOI: 10.3390/biology8030067
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (6.2 Å)
Structure validation

231564

PDB entries from 2025-02-19

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon