Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

6ASE

KRAS mutant-A59G in GDP-bound

Summary for 6ASE
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb6ase/pdb
Related6ASA
DescriptorGTPase KRas, MAGNESIUM ION, GUANOSINE-5'-DIPHOSPHATE, ... (4 entities in total)
Functional Keywordskras mutant a59g-gdp state, hydrolase
Biological sourceHomo sapiens (Human)
Cellular locationCell membrane ; Lipid-anchor ; Cytoplasmic side : P01116
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight19782.29
Authors
Westover, K.,Lu, J. (deposition date: 2017-08-24, release date: 2018-01-24, Last modification date: 2023-10-04)
Primary citationLu, J.,Bera, A.K.,Gondi, S.,Westover, K.D.
KRAS Switch Mutants D33E and A59G Crystallize in the State 1 Conformation.
Biochemistry, 57:324-333, 2018
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: KRAS switch loop movements play a crucial role in regulating RAS signaling, and alteration of these sensitive dynamics is a principal mechanism through which disease-associated RAS mutations lead to aberrant RAS activation. Prior studies suggest that despite a high degree of sequence similarity, the switches in KRAS are more dynamic than those in HRAS. We determined X-ray crystal structures of the rare tumorigenic KRAS mutants KRAS, in switch 1 (SW1), and KRAS, in switch 2 (SW2), bound to GDP and found these adopt nearly identical, open SW1 conformations as well as altered SW2 conformations. KRAS bound to a GTP analogue crystallizes in the same conformation. This open conformation is consistent with the inactive "state 1" previously observed for HRAS bound to GTP. For KRAS, switch rearrangements may be regulated by increased flexibility in the DXXGQ motif at codon 59. However, loss of interactions between side chains at codons 33 and 35 in the SW1 DPT motif drives changes for KRAS. The DPT motif is conserved for multiple members of the RAS subfamily but is not found in RAB, RHO, ARF, or Gα families, suggesting that dynamics mediated by this motif may be important for determining the selectivity of RAS-effector interactions. Biochemically, the consequence of altered switch dynamics is the same, showing impaired interaction with the guanine exchange factor SOS and loss of GAP-dependent GTPase activity. However, interactions with the RBD of RAF are preserved. Overall, these observations add to a body of evidence suggesting that HRAS and KRAS show meaningful differences in functionality stemming from differential protein dynamics independent of the hypervariable region.
PubMed: 29235861
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00974
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.554 Å)
Structure validation

247536

PDB entries from 2026-01-14

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon