Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

5F52

Erwinia chrysanthemi L-asparaginase + Aspartic acid

Summary for 5F52
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb5f52/pdb
Related5F65 5F8D
DescriptorL-asparaginase, ASPARTIC ACID, DI(HYDROXYETHYL)ETHER, ... (4 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsl-asparaginase, erwinia chrysanthemum, aspartic acid, hydrolase
Biological sourceDickeya chrysanthemi (Pectobacterium chrysanthemi, Erwinia chrysanthemi)
Total number of polymer chains4
Total formula weight142236.12
Authors
Nguyen, H.A.,Lavie, A. (deposition date: 2015-12-04, release date: 2016-04-06, Last modification date: 2023-09-27)
Primary citationNguyen, H.A.,Su, Y.,Lavie, A.
Structural Insight into Substrate Selectivity of Erwinia chrysanthemi l-Asparaginase.
Biochemistry, 55:1246-1253, 2016
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: l-Asparaginases of bacterial origin are a mainstay of acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment. The mechanism of action of these enzyme drugs is associated with their capacity to deplete the amino acid l-asparagine from the blood. However, clinical use of bacterial l-asparaginases is complicated by their dual l-asparaginase and l-glutaminase activities. The latter, even though representing only ∼10% of the overall activity, is partially responsible for the observed toxic side effects. Hence, l-asparaginases devoid of l-glutaminase activity hold potential as safer drugs. Understanding the key determinants of l-asparaginase substrate specificity is a prerequisite step toward the development of enzyme variants with reduced toxicity. Here we present crystal structures of the Erwinia chrysanthemi l-asparaginase in complex with l-aspartic acid and with l-glutamic acid. These structures reveal two enzyme conformations-open and closed-corresponding to the inactive and active states, respectively. The binding of ligands induces the positioning of the catalytic Thr15 into its active conformation, which in turn allows for the ordering and closure of the flexible N-terminal loop. Notably, l-aspartic acid is more efficient than l-glutamic acid in inducing the active positioning of Thr15. Structural elements explaining the preference of the enzyme for l-asparagine over l-glutamine are discussed with guidance to the future development of more specific l-asparaginases.
PubMed: 26855287
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01351
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.63 Å)
Structure validation

238895

數據於2025-07-16公開中

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon