3B83
Computer-Based Redesign of a beta Sandwich Protein Suggests that Extensive Negative Design Is Not Required for De Novo beta Sheet Design.
Summary for 3B83
Entry DOI | 10.2210/pdb3b83/pdb |
Descriptor | TEN-D3 (2 entities in total) |
Functional Keywords | beta sheet, computational redesigned protein, cell adhesion, egf-like domain, extracellular matrix, glycoprotein, phosphorylation, secreted, unknown function |
Biological source | Homo sapiens (Human) |
Total number of polymer chains | 8 |
Total formula weight | 89131.86 |
Authors | Hu, X.,Ke, H.,Kuhlman, B. (deposition date: 2007-10-31, release date: 2008-11-04, Last modification date: 2023-08-30) |
Primary citation | Hu, X.,Wang, H.,Ke, H.,Kuhlman, B. Computer-Based Redesign of a beta Sandwich Protein Suggests that Extensive Negative Design Is Not Required for De Novo beta Sheet Design. Structure, 16:1799-1805, 2008 Cited by PubMed Abstract: The de novo design of globular beta sheet proteins remains largely an unsolved problem. It is unclear whether most designs are failing because the designed sequences do not have favorable energies in the target conformations or whether more emphasis should be placed on negative design, that is, explicitly identifying sequences that have poor energies when adopting undesired conformations. We tested whether we could redesign the sequence of a naturally occurring beta sheet protein, tenascin, with a design algorithm that does not include explicit negative design. Denaturation experiments indicate that the designs are significantly more stable than the wild-type protein and the crystal structure of one design closely matches the design model. These results suggest that extensive negative design is not required to create well-folded beta sandwich proteins. However, it is important to note that negative design elements may be encoded in the conformation of the protein backbone which was preserved from the wild-type protein. PubMed: 19081056DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.09.013 PDB entries with the same primary citation |
Experimental method | X-RAY DIFFRACTION (2.4 Å) |
Structure validation
Download full validation report