Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@TwitterPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

2ZDL

Exploring trypsin S3 pocket

Summary for 2ZDL
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb2zdl/pdb
Related1K1P 2ZDK 2ZDM 2ZDN
Related PRD IDPRD_000604
DescriptorCationic trypsin, CALCIUM ION, SULFATE ION, ... (6 entities in total)
Functional Keywordshydrolase inhibitors, digestion, metal-binding, protease, secreted, serine protease, zymogen, hydrolase-hydrolase inhibitor complex, hydrolase/hydrolase inhibitor
Biological sourceBos taurus (Bovine)
Cellular locationSecreted, extracellular space: P00760
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight24109.17
Authors
Baum, B.,Brandt, T.,Heine, A.,Klebe, G. (deposition date: 2007-11-26, release date: 2008-10-14, Last modification date: 2023-11-01)
Primary citationBrandt, T.,Holzmann, N.,Muley, L.,Khayat, M.,Wegscheid-Gerlach, C.,Baum, B.,Heine, A.,Hangauer, D.,Klebe, G.
Congeneric but still distinct: how closely related trypsin ligands exhibit different thermodynamic and structural properties
J.Mol.Biol., 405:1170-1187, 2011
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: A congeneric series of benzamidine-type ligands with a central proline moiety and a terminal cycloalkyl group--linked by a secondary amine, ether, or methylene bridge--was synthesized as trypsin inhibitors. This series of inhibitors was investigated by isothermal titration calorimetry, crystal structure analysis in two crystal forms, and molecular dynamics simulations. Even though all of these congeneric ligands exhibited essentially the same affinity for trypsin, their binding profiles at the structural, dynamic, and thermodynamic levels are very distinct. The ligands display a pronounced enthalpy/entropy compensation that results in a nearly unchanged free energy of binding, even though individual enthalpy and entropy terms change significantly across the series. Crystal structures revealed that the secondary amine-linked analogs scatter over two distinct conformational families of binding modes that occupy either the inside or of the outside the protein's S3/S4 specificity pocket. In contrast, the ether-linked and methylene-linked ligands preferentially occupy the hydrophobic specificity pocket. This also explains why the latter ligands could only be crystallized in the conformationally restricting closed crystal form whereas the derivative with the highest residual mobility in the series escaped our attempts to crystallize it in the closed form; instead, a well-resolved structure could only be achieved in the open form with the ligand in disordered orientation. These distinct binding modes are supported by molecular dynamics simulations and correlate with the shifting enthalpic/entropic signatures of ligand binding. The examples demonstrate that, at the molecular level, binding modes and thermodynamic binding signatures can be very different even for closely related ligands. However, deviating binding profiles provide the opportunity to optimally address a given target.
PubMed: 21111747
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.11.038
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.8 Å)
Structure validation

226707

數據於2024-10-30公開中

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon