Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@TwitterPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

2BLR

Thaumatin Before A High Dose X-Ray "Burn"

Summary for 2BLR
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb2blr/pdb
Related1KWN 1LR2 1LR3 1LXZ 1LY0 1PP3 1RQW 1THI 1THU 1THV 1THW 2BLR
DescriptorTHAUMATIN I, L(+)-TARTARIC ACID (3 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsradiation damage, synchrotron, phasing, rip, plant protein, taste-modifying protein
Biological sourceTHAUMATOCOCCUS DANIELLII (MIRACLE FRUIT, KATEMFE)
Cellular locationCytoplasmic vesicle: P02883
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight22306.07
Authors
Nanao, M.H.,Ravelli, R. (deposition date: 2005-03-08, release date: 2005-09-07, Last modification date: 2015-09-16)
Primary citationNanao, M.H.,Sheldrick, G.M.,Ravelli, R.B.
Improving Radiation-Damage Substructures for Rip.
Acta Crystallogr.,Sect.D, 61:1227-, 2005
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Specific radiation damage can be used to solve macromolecular structures using the radiation-damage-induced phasing (RIP) method. The method has been investigated for six disulfide-containing test structures (elastase, insulin, lysozyme, ribonuclease A, trypsin and thaumatin) using data sets that were collected on a third-generation synchrotron undulator beamline with a highly attenuated beam. Each crystal was exposed to the unattenuated X-ray beam between the collection of a 'before' and an 'after' data set. The X-ray 'burn'-induced intensity differences ranged from 5 to 15%, depending on the protein investigated. X-ray-susceptible substructures were determined using the integrated direct and Patterson methods in SHELXD. The best substructures were found by downscaling the 'after' data set in SHELXC by a scale factor K, with optimal values ranging from 0.96 to 0.99. The initial substructures were improved through iteration with SHELXE by the addition of negatively occupied sites as well as a large number of relatively weak sites. The final substructures ranged from 40 to more than 300 sites, with strongest peaks as high as 57sigma. All structures except one could be solved: it was not possible to find the initial substructure for ribonuclease A, however, SHELXE iteration starting with the known five most susceptible sites gave excellent maps. Downscaling proved to be necessary for the solution of elastase, lysozyme and thaumatin and reduced the number of SHELXE iterations in the other cases. The combination of downscaling and substructure iteration provides important benefits for the phasing of macromolecular structures using radiation damage.
PubMed: 16131756
DOI: 10.1107/S0907444905019360
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.4 Å)
Structure validation

227111

數據於2024-11-06公開中

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon