Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

1ZSZ

Crystal structure of a computationally designed SspB heterodimer

Summary for 1ZSZ
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb1zsz/pdb
DescriptorStringent starvation protein B homolog, MAGNESIUM ION, ... (5 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsprotein design, aaa, adaptor, specificity, de novo protein
Biological sourceHaemophilus influenzae
More
Total number of polymer chains3
Total formula weight39931.56
Authors
Bolon, D.N.,Grant, R.A.,Baker, T.A.,Sauer, R.T. (deposition date: 2005-05-25, release date: 2005-08-23, Last modification date: 2023-08-23)
Primary citationBolon, D.N.,Grant, R.A.,Baker, T.A.,Sauer, R.T.
Specificity versus stability in computational protein design.
Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.Usa, 102:12724-12729, 2005
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Protein-protein interactions can be designed computationally by using positive strategies that maximize the stability of the desired structure and/or by negative strategies that seek to destabilize competing states. Here, we compare the efficacy of these methods in reengineering a protein homodimer into a heterodimer. The stability-design protein (positive design only) was experimentally more stable than the specificity-design heterodimer (positive and negative design). By contrast, only the specificity-design protein assembled as a homogenous heterodimer in solution, whereas the stability-design protein formed a mixture of homodimer and heterodimer species. The experimental stabilities of the engineered proteins correlated roughly with their calculated stabilities, and the crystal structure of the specificity-design heterodimer showed most of the predicted side-chain packing interactions and a main-chain conformation indistinguishable from the wild-type structure. These results indicate that the design simulations capture important features of both stability and structure and demonstrate that negative design can be critical for attaining specificity when competing states are close in structure space.
PubMed: 16129838
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506124102
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (2 Å)
Structure validation

250059

PDB entries from 2026-03-04

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon