Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

9M1A

Vitamin D receptor complex with a diethyldiphenylsilane derivative

This is a non-PDB format compatible entry.
Summary for 9M1A
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb9m1a/pdb
DescriptorVitamin D3 receptor, Mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 1, (4~{S})-5-[4-[diethyl-[4-(2-ethyl-2-oxidanyl-butoxy)-3-methyl-phenyl]silyl]-2-methyl-phenoxy]-4-oxidanyl-pentanoic acid, ... (4 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsvitamin d receptor, transcription
Biological sourceRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
More
Total number of polymer chains2
Total formula weight32682.68
Authors
Thilakarathne, N.M.H.N.,Hanazono, Y.,Ito, N.,Kagechika, H.,Fujii, S. (deposition date: 2025-02-25, release date: 2025-06-11, Last modification date: 2025-06-25)
Primary citationMudiyanselage, H.N.T.N.,Misawa, T.,Ochiai, K.,Demizu, Y.,Hanazono, Y.,Ito, N.,Fujii, S.
Structure-activity relationship and crystallographic analyses of non-secosteroidal vitamin D receptor ligands bearing diphenylsilane core as a hydrophobic pharmacophore.
Bioorg.Med.Chem., 128:118261-118261, 2025
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Vitamin D receptor (VDR) is an attractive target of drug discovery for multiple diseases. In this study, we systematically designed and synthesized a series of diphenylsilane derivatives with diverse hydrophobic substituents and investigated their structure-activity relationship (SAR) as VDR agonists. The SAR study revealed that the activity is dependent on the type of substituent and the position of substitution, and the diethyl-di-m-tolylsilane scaffold was identified as the most suitable hydrophobic core structure of this type of VDR ligands. Interestingly, the small structural difference between n-propyl and allyl substituents resulted in a large difference in the activity. Comparison of the co-crystal structures of 14 diphenylsilane compounds, including less potent compounds, bound to the rat VDR ligand-binding domain suggested that the differences in activity are due to a combination of factors, including differences in hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions, and ligand conformations.
PubMed: 40494220
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2025.118261
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.78 Å)
Structure validation

237992

数据于2025-06-25公开中

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon