Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@TwitterPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

7CM8

High resolution crystal structure of M92A mutant of O-acetyl-L-serine sulfhydrylase from Haemophilus influenzae

Summary for 7CM8
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb7cm8/pdb
Related5XCP
DescriptorCysteine synthase, SODIUM ION, GLYCEROL, ... (4 entities in total)
Functional Keywordscysteine synthase, substrate selection, mutant, competetive allostery, transferase
Biological sourceHaemophilus influenzae (strain ATCC 51907 / DSM 11121 / KW20 / Rd) (Haemophilus influenzae Rd KW20)
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight37351.32
Authors
Kaushik, A.,Rahisuddin, R.,Saini, N.,Kumaran, S. (deposition date: 2020-07-25, release date: 2020-08-19, Last modification date: 2023-11-29)
Primary citationKaushik, A.,Rahisuddin, R.,Saini, N.,Singh, R.P.,Kaur, R.,Koul, S.,Kumaran, S.
Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase.
J.Biol.Chem., 296:100041-100041, 2020
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: O-acetyl serine sulfhydrylase (OASS), referred to as cysteine synthase (CS), synthesizes cysteine from O-acetyl serine (OAS) and sulfur in bacteria and plants. The inherent challenge for CS is to overcome 4 to 6 log-folds stronger affinity for its natural inhibitor, serine acetyltransferase (SAT), as compared with its affinity for substrate, OAS. Our recent study showed that CS employs a novel competitive-allosteric mechanism to selectively recruit its substrate in the presence of natural inhibitor. In this study, we trace the molecular features that control selective substrate recruitment. To generalize our findings, we used CS from three different bacteria (Haemophilus, Salmonella, and Mycobacterium) as our model systems and analyzed structural and substrate-binding features of wild-type CS and its ∼13 mutants. Results show that CS uses a noncatalytic residue, M120, located 20 Å away from the reaction center, to discriminate in favor of substrate. M120A and background mutants display significantly reduced substrate binding, catalytic efficiency, and inhibitor binding. Results shows that M120 favors the substrate binding by selectively enhancing the affinity for the substrate and disengaging the inhibitor by 20 to 286 and 5- to 3-folds, respectively. Together, M120 confers a net discriminative force in favor of substrate by 100- to 858-folds.
PubMed: 33162395
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.014490
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.9 Å)
Structure validation

226707

数据于2024-10-30公开中

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon