Loading
PDBj
メニューPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

6QT3

Radiation damage study on a 16mer DNA segment, structure at 12.0 MGy dose

6QT3 の概要
エントリーDOI10.2210/pdb6qt3/pdb
関連するPDBエントリー6QT1 6QT2 6QT4 6QT5 6QT6 6QT7
分子名称DNA (5'-D(*GP*CP*TP*GP*GP*AP*AP*AP*TP*TP*TP*CP*CP*AP*GP*C)-3'), CALCIUM ION (3 entities in total)
機能のキーワードdna, radiation damage, global damage, specific damage
由来する生物種synthetic construct
タンパク質・核酸の鎖数1
化学式量合計5138.66
構造登録者
Bugris, V.,Harmat, V.,Ferenc, G.,Brockhauser, S.,Carmichael, I.,Garman, E.F. (登録日: 2019-02-22, 公開日: 2019-07-17, 最終更新日: 2024-01-24)
主引用文献Bugris, V.,Harmat, V.,Ferenc, G.,Brockhauser, S.,Carmichael, I.,Garman, E.F.
Radiation-damage investigation of a DNA 16-mer.
J.Synchrotron Radiat., 26:998-1009, 2019
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: In macromolecular crystallography, a great deal of effort has been invested in understanding radiation-damage progression. While the sensitivity of protein crystals has been well characterized, crystals of DNA and of DNA-protein complexes have not thus far been studied as thoroughly. Here, a systematic investigation of radiation damage to a crystal of a DNA 16-mer diffracting to 1.8 Å resolution and held at 100 K, up to an absorbed dose of 45 MGy, is reported. The RIDL (Radiation-Induced Density Loss) automated computational tool was used for electron-density analysis. Both the global and specific damage to the DNA crystal as a function of dose were monitored, following careful calibration of the X-ray flux and beam profile. The DNA crystal was found to be fairly radiation insensitive to both global and specific damage, with half of the initial diffraction intensity being lost at an absorbed average diffraction-weighted dose, D, of 19 MGy, compared with 9 MGy for chicken egg-white lysozyme crystals under the same beam conditions but at the higher resolution of 1.4 Å. The coefficient of sensitivity of the DNA crystal was 0.014 Å MGy, which is similar to that observed for proteins. These results imply that the significantly greater radiation hardness of DNA and RNA compared with protein observed in a DNA-protein complex and an RNA-protein complex could be due to scavenging action by the protein, thereby protecting the DNA and RNA in these studies. In terms of specific damage, the regions of DNA that were found to be sensitive were those associated with some of the bound calcium ions sequestered from the crystallization buffer. In contrast, moieties farther from these sites showed only small changes even at higher doses.
PubMed: 31274421
DOI: 10.1107/S160057751900763X
主引用文献が同じPDBエントリー
実験手法
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.8 Å)
構造検証レポート
Validation report summary of 6qt3
検証レポート(詳細版)ダウンロードをダウンロード

246905

件を2025-12-31に公開中

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon