6ASA

KRAS mutant-D33E in GDP-bound

Summary for 6ASA

• Entry DOI: 10.2210/pdb6asa/pdb
• Related: 6ASE
• Descriptor: GTPase KRas, GUANOSINE-5'-DIPHOSPHATE, MAGNESIUM ION, ... (4 entities in total)
• Functional Keywords: kras d33e-gdp structure, hydrolase
• Biological source: Homo sapiens (Human)
• Cellular location: Cell membrane ; Lipid-anchor ; Cytoplasmic side : P01116
• Total number of polymer chains: 1
• Total formula weight: 19624.11

Authors

Lu, J.,Westover, K. (deposition date: 2017-08-24, release date: 2018-01-24, Last modification date: 2023-10-04)

Primary citation

Lu, J.,Bera, A.K.,Gondi, S.,Westover, K.D.
KRAS Switch Mutants D33E and A59G Crystallize in the State 1 Conformation.
Biochemistry, 57:324-333, 2018

PubMed Abstract: KRAS switch loop movements play a crucial role in regulating RAS signaling, and alteration of these sensitive dynamics is a principal mechanism through which disease-associated RAS mutations lead to aberrant RAS activation. Prior studies suggest that despite a high degree of sequence similarity, the switches in KRAS are more dynamic than those in HRAS. We determined X-ray crystal structures of the rare tumorigenic KRAS mutants KRAS, in switch 1 (SW1), and KRAS, in switch 2 (SW2), bound to GDP and found these adopt nearly identical, open SW1 conformations as well as altered SW2 conformations. KRAS bound to a GTP analogue crystallizes in the same conformation. This open conformation is consistent with the inactive "state 1" previously observed for HRAS bound to GTP. For KRAS, switch rearrangements may be regulated by increased flexibility in the DXXGQ motif at codon 59. However, loss of interactions between side chains at codons 33 and 35 in the SW1 DPT motif drives changes for KRAS. The DPT motif is conserved for multiple members of the RAS subfamily but is not found in RAB, RHO, ARF, or Gα families, suggesting that dynamics mediated by this motif may be important for determining the selectivity of RAS-effector interactions. Biochemically, the consequence of altered switch dynamics is the same, showing impaired interaction with the guanine exchange factor SOS and loss of GAP-dependent GTPase activity. However, interactions with the RBD of RAF are preserved. Overall, these observations add to a body of evidence suggesting that HRAS and KRAS show meaningful differences in functionality stemming from differential protein dynamics independent of the hypervariable region.

PubMed: 29235861
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00974

Experimental method

X-RAY DIFFRACTION (2.545 Å)