Loading
PDBj
メニューPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

4AHU

Parallel screening of a low molecular weight compound library: do differences in methodology affect hit identification

4AHU の概要
エントリーDOI10.2210/pdb4ahu/pdb
関連するPDBエントリー4AH9 4AHR 4AHS 4AHT 4AHV
分子名称INTEGRASE, SULFATE ION, CHLORIDE ION, ... (8 entities in total)
機能のキーワードtransferase, fragment screening
由来する生物種HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS (HIV)
タンパク質・核酸の鎖数2
化学式量合計41549.44
構造登録者
Wielens, J.,Heady, S.J.,Rhodes, D.I.,Mulder, R.J.,Dolezal, O.,Deadman, J.J.,Newman, J.,Chalmers, D.K.,Parker, M.W.,Peat, T.S.,Scanlon, M.J. (登録日: 2012-02-07, 公開日: 2012-12-19, 最終更新日: 2023-12-20)
主引用文献Wielens, J.,Headey, S.J.,Rhodes, D.I.,Mulder, R.J.,Dolezal, O.,Deadman, J.J.,Newman, J.,Chalmers, D.K.,Parker, M.W.,Peat, T.S.,Scanlon, M.J.
Parallel Screening of Low Molecular Weight Fragment Libraries: Do Differences in Methodology Affect Hit Identification?
J.Biomol.Screen, 18:147-, 2013
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Fragment screening is becoming widely accepted as a technique to identify hit compounds for the development of novel lead compounds. In neighboring laboratories, we have recently, and independently, performed a fragment screening campaign on the HIV-1 integrase core domain (IN) using similar commercially purchased fragment libraries. The two campaigns used different screening methods for the preliminary identification of fragment hits; one used saturation transfer difference nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (STD-NMR), and the other used surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy. Both initial screens were followed by X-ray crystallography. Using the STD-NMR/X-ray approach, 15 IN/fragment complexes were identified, whereas the SPR/X-ray approach found 6 complexes. In this article, we compare the approaches that were taken by each group and the results obtained, and we look at what factors could potentially influence the final results. We find that despite using different approaches with little overlap of initial hits, both approaches identified binding sites on IN that provided a basis for fragment-based lead discovery and further lead development. Comparison of hits identified in the two studies highlights a key role for both the conditions under which fragment binding is measured and the criteria selected to classify hits.
PubMed: 23139382
DOI: 10.1177/1087057112465979
主引用文献が同じPDBエントリー
実験手法
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.9 Å)
構造検証レポート
Validation report summary of 4ahu
検証レポート(詳細版)ダウンロードをダウンロード

246905

件を2025-12-31に公開中

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon