Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@TwitterPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

1LA1

Gro-EL Fragment (Apical Domain) Comprising Residues 188-379

Summary for 1LA1
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb1la1/pdb
Related1DK7 1KID
DescriptorGroEL (2 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsmolecular chaperone, protein folding, chaperone
Biological sourceEscherichia coli
Cellular locationCytoplasm : P0A6F5
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight20727.85
Authors
Ashcroft, A.E.,Brinker, A.,Coyle, J.E.,Weber, F.,Kaiser, M.,Moroder, L.,Parsons, M.R.,Jager, J.,Hartl, U.F.,Hayer-Hartl, M.,Radford, S.E. (deposition date: 2002-03-27, release date: 2002-04-03, Last modification date: 2023-08-16)
Primary citationAshcroft, A.E.,Brinker, A.,Coyle, J.E.,Weber, F.,Kaiser, M.,Moroder, L.,Parsons, M.R.,Jager, J.,Hartl, U.F.,Hayer-Hartl, M.,Radford, S.E.
Structural plasticity and noncovalent substrate binding in the GroEL apical domain. A study using electrospay ionization mass spectrometry and fluorescence binding studies.
J.Biol.Chem., 277:33115-33126, 2002
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Advances in understanding how GroEL binds to non-native proteins are reported. Conformational flexibility in the GroEL apical domain, which could account for the variety of substrates that GroEL binds, is illustrated by comparison of several independent crystallographic structures of apical domain constructs that show conformational plasticity in helices H and I. Additionally, ESI-MS indicates that apical domain constructs have co-populated conformations at neutral pH. To assess the ability of different apical domain conformers to bind co-chaperone and substrate, model peptides corresponding to the mobile loop of GroES and to helix D from rhodanese were studied. Analysis of apical domain-peptide complexes by ESI-MS indicates that only the folded or partially folded apical domain conformations form complexes that survive gas phase conditions. Fluorescence binding studies show that the apical domain can fully bind both peptides independently. No competition for binding was observed, suggesting the peptides have distinct apical domain-binding sites. Blocking the GroES-apical domain-binding site in GroEL rendered the chaperonin inactive in binding GroES and in assisting the folding of denatured rhodanese, but still capable of binding non-native proteins, supporting the conclusion that GroES and substrate proteins have, at least partially, distinct binding sites even in the intact GroEL tetradecamer.
PubMed: 12065585
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M203398200
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (2.06 Å)
Structure validation

226707

건을2024-10-30부터공개중

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon