Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

6BTV

Solution NMR structures for CcoTx-II

Summary for 6BTV
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb6btv/pdb
Related6BR0
NMR InformationBMRB: 30377
DescriptorBeta-theraphotoxin-Cm1b (1 entity in total)
Functional Keywordsspider, toxin, disulfide, ick, pain, nav1.7, voltage gated ion channel
Biological sourceCeratogyrus marshalli (Straighthorned baboon tarantula)
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight4105.77
Authors
Agwa, A.J.,Schroeder, C.I. (deposition date: 2017-12-07, release date: 2018-05-09, Last modification date: 2023-06-14)
Primary citationAgwa, A.J.,Peigneur, S.,Chow, C.Y.,Lawrence, N.,Craik, D.J.,Tytgat, J.,King, G.F.,Henriques, S.T.,Schroeder, C.I.
Gating modifier toxins isolated from spider venom: Modulation of voltage-gated sodium channels and the role of lipid membranes.
J. Biol. Chem., 293:9041-9052, 2018
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Gating modifier toxins (GMTs) are venom-derived peptides isolated from spiders and other venomous creatures and modulate activity of disease-relevant voltage-gated ion channels and are therefore being pursued as therapeutic leads. The amphipathic surface profile of GMTs has prompted the proposal that some GMTs simultaneously bind to the cell membrane and voltage-gated ion channels in a trimolecular complex. Here, we examined whether there is a relationship among spider GMT amphipathicity, membrane binding, and potency or selectivity for voltage-gated sodium (Na) channels. We used NMR spectroscopy and calculations to examine the structures and physicochemical properties of a panel of nine GMTs and deployed surface plasmon resonance to measure GMT affinity for lipids putatively found in proximity to Na channels. Electrophysiology was used to quantify GMT activity on Na1.7, an ion channel linked to chronic pain. Selectivity of the peptides was further examined against a panel of Na channel subtypes. We show that GMTs adsorb to the outer leaflet of anionic lipid bilayers through electrostatic interactions. We did not observe a direct correlation between GMT amphipathicity and affinity for lipid bilayers. Furthermore, GMT-lipid bilayer interactions did not correlate with potency or selectivity for Nas. We therefore propose that increased membrane binding is unlikely to improve subtype selectivity and that the conserved amphipathic GMT surface profile is an adaptation that facilitates simultaneous modulation of multiple Nas.
PubMed: 29703751
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002553
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
SOLUTION NMR
Structure validation

227344

數據於2024-11-13公開中

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon