Loading
PDBj
メニューPDBj@FacebookPDBj@TwitterPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

2AU4

Class I GTP aptamer

2AU4 の概要
エントリーDOI10.2210/pdb2au4/pdb
NMR情報BMRB: 6814
分子名称Class I RNA aptamer to GTP, GUANOSINE-5'-TRIPHOSPHATE (2 entities in total)
機能のキーワードrna, aptamer
タンパク質・核酸の鎖数1
化学式量合計13847.12
構造登録者
Carothers, J.M.,Davis, J.H.,Chou, J.J.,Szostak, J.W. (登録日: 2005-08-26, 公開日: 2006-03-28, 最終更新日: 2024-05-22)
主引用文献Carothers, J.M.,Davis, J.H.,Chou, J.J.,Szostak, J.W.
Solution structure of an informationally complex high-affinity RNA aptamer to GTP.
Rna, 12:567-579, 2006
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Higher-affinity RNA aptamers to GTP are more informationally complex than lower-affinity aptamers. Analog binding studies have shown that the additional information needed to improve affinity does not specify more interactions with the ligand. In light of those observations, we would like to understand the structural characteristics that enable complex aptamers to bind their ligands with higher affinity. Here we present the solution structure of the 41-nt Class I GTP aptamer (K(d) = 75 nM) as determined by NMR. The backbone of the aptamer forms a reverse-S that shapes the binding pocket. The ligand nucleobase stacks between purine platforms and makes hydrogen bonds with the edge of another base. Interestingly, the local modes of interaction for the Class I aptamer and an RNA aptamer that binds ATP with a K(d) of 6 microM are very much alike. The aptamers exhibit nearly identical levels of binding specificity and fraction of ligand sequestered from the solvent (81%-85%). However, the GTP aptamer is more informationally complex (approximately 45 vs. 35 bits) and has a larger recognition bulge (15 vs. 12 nucleotides) with many more stabilizing base-base interactions. Because the aptamers have similar modes of ligand binding, we conclude that the stabilizing structural elements in the Class I aptamer are responsible for much of the difference in K(d). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that increasing the number of intra-RNA interactions, rather than adding specific contacts to the ligand, is the simplest way to improve binding affinity.
PubMed: 16510427
DOI: 10.1261/rna.2251306
主引用文献が同じPDBエントリー
実験手法
SOLUTION NMR
構造検証レポート
Validation report summary of 2au4
検証レポート(詳細版)ダウンロードをダウンロード

227111

件を2024-11-06に公開中

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon