Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@TwitterPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

2A7E

On the Routine Use of Soft X-Rays in Macromolecular Crystallography, Part III- The Optimal Data Collection Wavelength

Summary for 2A7E
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb2a7e/pdb
DescriptorDNA (5'-D(*CP*CP*CP*TP*AP*GP*GP*G)-3') (2 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsa-dna, double helix, dna
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight2427.61
Authors
Mueller-Dieckmann, C.,Panjikar, S.,Tucker, P.A.,Weiss, M.S. (deposition date: 2005-07-05, release date: 2005-07-19, Last modification date: 2024-02-14)
Primary citationMueller-Dieckmann, C.,Panjikar, S.,Tucker, P.A.,Weiss, M.S.
On the routine use of soft X-rays in macromolecular crystallography. Part III. The optimal data-collection wavelength.
Acta Crystallogr.,Sect.D, 61:1263-1272, 2005
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Complete and highly redundant data sets were collected at different wavelengths between 0.80 and 2.65 A for a total of ten different protein and DNA model systems. The magnitude of the anomalous signal-to-noise ratio as assessed by the quotient R(anom)/R(r.i.m.) was found to be influenced by the data-collection wavelength and the nature of the anomalously scattering substructure. By utilizing simple empirical correlations, for instance between the estimated deltaF/F and the expected R(anom) or the data-collection wavelength and the expected R(r.i.m.), the wavelength at which the highest anomalous signal-to-noise ratio can be expected could be estimated even before the experiment. Almost independent of the nature of the anomalously scattering substructure and provided that no elemental X-ray absorption edge is nearby, this optimal wavelength is 2.1 A.
PubMed: 16131760
DOI: 10.1107/S0907444905021475
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.66 Å)
Structure validation

226707

건을2024-10-30부터공개중

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon