2A7E
On the Routine Use of Soft X-Rays in Macromolecular Crystallography, Part III- The Optimal Data Collection Wavelength
Summary for 2A7E
Entry DOI | 10.2210/pdb2a7e/pdb |
Descriptor | DNA (5'-D(*CP*CP*CP*TP*AP*GP*GP*G)-3') (2 entities in total) |
Functional Keywords | a-dna, double helix, dna |
Total number of polymer chains | 1 |
Total formula weight | 2427.61 |
Authors | Mueller-Dieckmann, C.,Panjikar, S.,Tucker, P.A.,Weiss, M.S. (deposition date: 2005-07-05, release date: 2005-07-19, Last modification date: 2024-02-14) |
Primary citation | Mueller-Dieckmann, C.,Panjikar, S.,Tucker, P.A.,Weiss, M.S. On the routine use of soft X-rays in macromolecular crystallography. Part III. The optimal data-collection wavelength. Acta Crystallogr.,Sect.D, 61:1263-1272, 2005 Cited by PubMed Abstract: Complete and highly redundant data sets were collected at different wavelengths between 0.80 and 2.65 A for a total of ten different protein and DNA model systems. The magnitude of the anomalous signal-to-noise ratio as assessed by the quotient R(anom)/R(r.i.m.) was found to be influenced by the data-collection wavelength and the nature of the anomalously scattering substructure. By utilizing simple empirical correlations, for instance between the estimated deltaF/F and the expected R(anom) or the data-collection wavelength and the expected R(r.i.m.), the wavelength at which the highest anomalous signal-to-noise ratio can be expected could be estimated even before the experiment. Almost independent of the nature of the anomalously scattering substructure and provided that no elemental X-ray absorption edge is nearby, this optimal wavelength is 2.1 A. PubMed: 16131760DOI: 10.1107/S0907444905021475 PDB entries with the same primary citation |
Experimental method | X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.66 Å) |
Structure validation
Download full validation report