Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

1QDA

Crystal structure of epidoxorubicin-formaldehyde virtual crosslink of DNA

Summary for 1QDA
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb1qda/pdb
Related1D15 1D33 1D54
Descriptor5' -D(CP*GP*CP*(G49)P*CP*GP)-3', 4'-EPIDOXORUBICIN (3 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsdouble helix, drug-dna complex, dna
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight2368.76
Authors
Podell, E.R.,Harrington, D.J.,Taatjes, D.J.,Koch, T.H. (deposition date: 1999-05-17, release date: 1999-09-15, Last modification date: 2024-02-14)
Primary citationPodell, E.R.,Harrington, D.J.,Taatjes, D.J.,Koch, T.H.
Crystal structure of epidoxorubicin-formaldehyde virtual crosslink of DNA and evidence for its formation in human breast-cancer cells.
Acta Crystallogr.,Sect.D, 55:1516-1523, 1999
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Epidoxorubicin and daunorubicin are proposed to be cytotoxic to tumor cells by catalyzing production of formaldehyde through redox cycling and using the formaldehyde for covalent attachment to DNA at G bases. The crystal structure of epidoxorubicin covalently bound to a d(CGCGCG) oligomer was determined to 1.6 A resolution. The structure reveals slightly distorted B-form DNA bearing two molecules of epidoxorubicin symmetrically intercalated at the termini, with each covalently attached from its N3' to N2 of a G base via a CH2 group from the formaldehyde. The structure is analogous to daunorubicin covalently bound to d(CGCGCG) determined previously, except for additional hydrogen bonding from the epimeric O4' to O2 of a C base. The role of drug-DNA covalent bonding in cells was investigated with synthetic epidoxorubicin-formaldehyde conjugate (Epidoxoform) and synthetic daunorubicin-formaldehyde conjugate (Daunoform). Uptake and location of drug fluorophore in doxorubicin-resistant human breast-cancer cells (MCF-7/ADR cells) was observed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. The fluorophore of Daunoform appeared more rapidly in cells and was released more rapidly from cells than the fluorophore of Epidoxoform over a 3 h exposure period. The fluorophore appeared predominantly in the nucleus of cells treated with both conjugates. The difference in uptake is explained in terms of the slower rate of hydrolysis of Epidoxoform to the species reactive with DNA and a proposed slower release from DNA based upon the crystal structures.
PubMed: 10489446
DOI: 10.1107/S0907444999008161
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.6 Å)
Structure validation

237992

数据于2025-06-25公开中

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon