Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@TwitterPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDB
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

1Q5J

Crystal structure of bacteriorhodopsin mutant P91A crystallized from bicelles

Summary for 1Q5J
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb1q5j/pdb
Related1Q5I
DescriptorBacteriorhodopsin, RETINAL (3 entities in total)
Functional Keywordsalpha helix, membrane protein
Biological sourceHalobacterium salinarum
Cellular locationCell membrane ; Multi-pass membrane protein : P02945
Total number of polymer chains2
Total formula weight54375.80
Authors
Yohannan, S.,Faham, S.,Yang, D.,Whitelegge, J.P.,Bowie, J.U. (deposition date: 2003-08-07, release date: 2004-01-06, Last modification date: 2024-10-30)
Primary citationYohannan, S.,Faham, S.,Yang, D.,Whitelegge, J.P.,Bowie, J.U.
The evolution of transmembrane helix kinks and the structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors.
Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA, 101:959-963, 2004
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: One of the hallmarks of membrane protein structure is the high frequency of transmembrane helix kinks, which commonly occur at proline residues. Because the proline side chain usually precludes normal helix geometry, it is reasonable to expect that proline residues generate these kinks. We observe, however, that the three prolines in bacteriorhodopsin transmembrane helices can be changed to alanine with little structural consequences. This finding leads to a conundrum: if proline is not required for helix bending, why are prolines commonly present at bends in transmembrane helices? We propose an evolutionary hypothesis in which a mutation to proline initially induces the kink. The resulting packing defects are later repaired by further mutation, thereby locking the kink in the structure. Thus, most prolines in extant proteins can be removed without major structural consequences. We further propose that nonproline kinks are places where vestigial prolines were later removed during evolution. Consistent with this hypothesis, at 14 of 17 nonproline kinks in membrane proteins of known structure, we find prolines in homologous sequences. Our analysis allows us to predict kink positions with >90% reliability. Kink prediction indicates that different G protein-coupled receptor proteins have different kink patterns and therefore different structures.
PubMed: 14732697
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0306077101
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (2.1 Å)
Structure validation

227111

数据于2024-11-06公开中

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon