TOTAL NUMBER OF NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 1598, NUMBER OF INTRA-RESIDUE NOES USED FOR THE ...TOTAL NUMBER OF NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 1598, NUMBER OF INTRA-RESIDUE NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 796, NUMBER OF SEQUENTIAL NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 437, NUMBER OF MEDIUM RANGE NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 179, NUMBER OF LONG RANGE (I,J, J > I+4) NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 186, NUMBER OF DIHEDRAL ANGLES RESTRAINTS USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 52, NUMBER OF HYDROGEN BOND RESTRAINTS USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 5, MINIMAL TARGET FUNCTION WAS 2.80, MEAN TARGET FUNCTION OF 16 STRUCTURES WAS 3.00 (+-0.4), THE NUMBER OF NOE VIOLATIONS > 0.02 NM WAS 3 (+-1), THE NUMBER OF NOE VIOLATIONS > 0.03 NM WAS 0, THE NUMBER OF DIHEDRAL ANGLES VIOLATIONS > 10 DEGREES WAS 0, RMSDS BACK BONE (6-124): 0.042 (+-0.015) NM, RMSDS ALL HEAVY ATOMS (6-124): 0.098 (+-0.016)NM
Text: TOTAL NUMBER OF NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 1598, NUMBER OF INTRA-RESIDUE NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 796, NUMBER OF SEQUENTIAL NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 437, NUMBER OF MEDIUM RANGE ...Text: TOTAL NUMBER OF NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 1598, NUMBER OF INTRA-RESIDUE NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 796, NUMBER OF SEQUENTIAL NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 437, NUMBER OF MEDIUM RANGE NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 179, NUMBER OF LONG RANGE (I,J, J > I+4) NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 186, NUMBER OF DIHEDRAL ANGLES RESTRAINTS USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 52, NUMBER OF HYDROGEN BOND RESTRAINTS USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 5, MINIMAL TARGET FUNCTION WAS 2.80, MEAN TARGET FUNCTION OF 16 STRUCTURES WAS 3.00 (+-0.4), THE NUMBER OF NOE VIOLATIONS > 0.02 NM WAS 3 (+-1), THE NUMBER OF NOE VIOLATIONS > 0.03 NM WAS 0, THE NUMBER OF DIHEDRAL ANGLES VIOLATIONS > 10 DEGREES WAS 0, RMSDS BACK BONE (6-124): 0.042 (+-0.015) NM, RMSDS ALL HEAVY ATOMS (6-124): 0.098 (+-0.016)NM